Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Electronic Stability Control Systems for Heavy Vehicles

 
Docket ID: NHTSA-2012-0065
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Parent Agency: Department of Transportation (DOT)
Summary:

This rulemaking would promulgate a new Federal standard that would require stability control systems on truck tractors and motorcoaches that address both rollover and loss of control crashes, after an extensive research program to evaluate the available technologies, an evaluation of the costs and benefits, and a review of manufacturer's product plans. Rollover and loss of control crashes involving heavy vehicles is a serious safety issue that is responsible for 304 fatalities and 2,738 injuries annually. They are also a major cause of traffic tie-ups, resulting in millions of dollars of lost productivity and excess energy consumption each year. Suppliers and truck and motorcoach manufacturers have developed stability control technology for heavy vehicles to mitigate these types of crashes. Our preliminary estimate produces an effectiveness range of 37 to 56 percent against single-vehicle tractor-trailer rollover crashes and three to fourteen percent against loss of control crashes that result from skidding on the road surface. With these effectiveness estimates, annually, we estimate 29-66 lives would be saved, 517-979 MAIS 1-5 injuries would be reduced, and 810-1,693 crashes that involved property damage only would be eliminated. Additionally, it would save $10-$26 million in property damage and travel delays. Based on the technology unit costs and affected vehicles, we estimate technology costs would be $55 to 107 million, annually. However, the costs savings from reducing travel delay and property damage would produce net benefits of $128-$372 million. This rulemaking is responsive to requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act.

RIN: 2127-AK97
Impacts and Effects: None
CFR Citation: 49 CFR 571
Priority: Economically Significant
UA and Regulatory Plan Information open glossary dialog  
Publication Period: Fall 2015
Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major Rule: Yes
Legal Authorities: 49 U.S.C. 30111, 49 U.S.C. 30115, 49 U.S.C. 30117, 49 U.S.C. 30166, 49 U.S.C. 322, delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95
Government Levels Affected: No
Federalism Implications: No
Unfunded Mandates: No
Requires Regulatory Flexibility Analysis: No
Small Entities Affected: No
International Impacts: No
Energy Effects: No
Included in Regulatory Plan: No
Legal Deadline
ActionSourceDescriptionDate
StatutoryOtherFinal Rule10/01/2014
Timetable
ActionDateFR Citation
NPRM05/23/201277 FR 30766
NPRM Comment Period End08/21/2012
Final Rule06/23/201580 FR 36050
Final Rule Effective08/24/2015
Docket Details open glossary dialog  
Related RINs: None
Related Dockets: None
Disposition: Pending
Type: Rulemaking
Subtype: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
 

Primary Documents

View All  (13)
Comment Now!
Due Aug 21, 2012 11:59 PM ET
Proposed Rule
Posted: 07/02/2012
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0008
Comment Now!
Due Aug 21, 2012 11:59 PM ET
Proposed Rule
Posted: 05/23/2012
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0001
Comment Period Closed
Other
Posted: 06/12/2015
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0064
Comment Period Closed
Other
Posted: 06/12/2015
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0062
Comment Period Closed
Other
Posted: 06/12/2015
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0063

Supporting Documents

View All  (13)
Comments Not Accepted
Supporting & Related Material
Posted: 11/24/2014
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0060
Comments Not Accepted
Supporting & Related Material
Posted: 11/24/2014
ID: NHTSA-2012-0065-0059

Comments

View All  (49)

49
Comments Received*
Regulatory Timeline
Pre Rule
Current Stage
Proposed Rule
Current Stage
Final Rule
Current Stage
Completed
Current Stage
Agency Contact
George Soodoo
Chief, Vehicle Safety Dynamics Division (NVS-122)
NHTSA/DOT
george.soodoo@dot.gov
202 366-2720
202 366-4329 (Fax)
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.
Washington, DC 20590
*This count refers to the total comment/submissions received on this docket, as of 11:59 PM yesterday. Note: Agencies review all submissions, however some agencies may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing private or proprietary information, inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-mail campaign. This can result in discrepancies between this count and those displayed when conducting searches on the Public Submission document type. For specific information about an agency’s public submission policy, refer to its website or the Federal Register document.