World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Proceedings: Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Automobiles from United States
This Notice document was issued by the Office of United States Trade Representative (USTR)
For related information, Open Docket Folder
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Dispute No. WTO/DS440]
WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States—Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Automobiles From the United States
Office of the United States Trade Representative.
Notice; request for comments.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) is providing notice that on September 18, 2012, the United States requested the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (“WTO Agreement”) with the People's Republic of China (“China”) concerning China's anti-dumping and countervailing duties on certain automobiles from the United States. That request may be found at in a document designated as WT/DS440/2. USTR invites written comments from the public concerning the issues raised in this dispute.
Although USTR will accept any comments received during the course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be submitted on or before November 16, 2012, to be assured of timely consideration by USTR.
Public comments should be submitted electronically to , docket number USTR-2012-0016. If you are unable to provide submissions at , please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of transmission. If (as explained below) the comment contains confidential information, then the comment should be submitted by fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640.
For Further Information Contact
Dan Stirk, Associate General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative; or Joseph Rieras, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative. Contact information is: 600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-3150.
Section 127(b)(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”) (19 U.S.C. 3537(b)(1)) requires that notice and opportunity for comment be provided after the United States submits or receives a request for the establishment of a WTO dispute settlement panel. Consistent with this obligation, USTR is providing notice that the United States has requested a panel pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (“DSU”). Once it is established, the panel will hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, and would be expected to issue a report on its findings and recommendations within nine months after it is established.
Major Issues Raised by the United States
The United States considers that certain measures imposing antidumping and countervailing duties on certain automobiles from the United States are inconsistent with China's obligations under the WTO Agreement. The measures are set forth in the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China (“MOFCOM”) Notice No. 20  and Notice No. 84 , including any and all annexes. These measures appear to be inconsistent with Articles 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 4.1, 5.4, 6.5.1, 6.8, 6.9, 12.2, 12.2.2, and Paragraph 1 of Annex II of the WTO Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (“AD Agreement”); Articles 10, 11.4, 12.4.1, 12.7, 12.8, 15.1, 15.2, 15.4, 15.5, 16.1, 22.3, and 22.5 of the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (“SCM Agreement”); and Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (“GATT 1994”). On July 5, 2012, the United States requested consultations with China. That request may be found at contained in a document designated as WT/DS440/1. The United States and China held consultations on August 23, 2012, but the consultations did not resolve the matter.
Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public comments electronically to docket number USTR-2012-0016. If you are unable to provide submissions at , please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of transmission.
To submit comments via , enter docket number USTR-2012-0016 on the home page and click “search”. The site will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated with this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting “Notice” under “Document Type” on the left side of the search-results page, and click on the link entitled “Comment Now!.” (For further information on using the Web site, please consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on “How to Use Regulations.gov Site” on the bottom of the page.)
The site provides the option of providing comments by filling in a “Type Comments” field, or by attaching a document using an “Upload File” field. It is expected that most comments will be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is sufficient to type “See attached” in the “Type Comments” field.
A person requesting that information contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated as confidential business information must certify that such information is business confidential and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter. Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such and the submission must be marked “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL” at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must be submitted to . The non-confidential summary will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection.
Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information or advice may qualify as such, the submitter—
(1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
(2) Must clearly mark the material as “SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE” at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
(3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or advice.
Any comment containing confidential information must be submitted by fax. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must be submitted to . The non-confidential summary will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection.
Pursuant to section 127(e) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement proceeding accessible to the public at , docket number USTR-2012-0016. The public file will include non-confidential comments received by USTR from the public with respect to the dispute. If a dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event of an appeal from such a panel, the U.S. submissions, any non-confidential submissions, or non-confidential summaries of submissions, received from other participants in the dispute, will be made available to the public on USTR's Web site at , and the report of the panel, and, if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body, will be available on the Web site of the World Trade Organization, . Comments open to public inspection may be viewed on the Web site.
Acting Assistant United States Trade Representative for Monitoring and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2012-25053 Filed 10-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F3-P
No documents available.
| || |
Due Nov 16 2012, at 11:59 PM ET
Show More Details
Date Posted: Oct 11, 2012
Federal Register Number: 2012-25053
This document is contained in
Related RINs: None
* This count refers to the total comment/submissions received on this document, as of 11:59 PM yesterday. Note: Agencies review all submissions, however some agencies may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing private or proprietary information, inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-mail campaign. This can result in discrepancies between this count and those displayed when conducting searches on the Public Submission document type. For specific information about an agency’s public submission policy, refer to its website or the Federal Register document.
Document text and images courtesy of the