Fiscal Year 2012 Allocation of Additional Tariff-Rate Quota Volume for Raw Cane Sugar, etc.

This Notice document was issued by the Office of United States Trade Representative (USTR)

For related information, Open Docket Folder  Docket folder icon


OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

Fiscal Year 2012 Allocation of Additional Tariff-Rate Quota Volume for Raw Cane Sugar and Reallocation of Unused Fiscal Year 2012 Tariff-Rate Quota Volume for Raw Cane Sugar

Agency

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

Action

Notice.

Summary

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is providing notice of country-by-country allocations of additional Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 in-quota quantity of the tariff-rate quota (TRQ) for imported raw cane sugar and of country-by-country reallocations of the FY 2012 in-quota quantity of the tariff-rate quota for imported raw cane sugar.

Dates

Effective Date: April 26, 2012.

Addresses

Inquiries may be mailed or delivered to Ann Heilman-Dahl, Director of Agricultural Affairs, Office of Agricultural Affairs, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508.

For Further Information Contact

Ann Heilman-Dahl, Office of the United States Trade Representative, Office of Agricultural Affairs, 202-395-6127.

Supplementary Information

Pursuant to Additional U.S. Note 5 to Chapter 17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), the United States maintains TRQs for imports of raw cane and refined sugar.

Section 404(d)(3) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3601(d)(3)) authorizes the President to allocate the in-quota quantity of a TRQ for any agricultural product among supplying countries or customs areas. The President delegated this authority to the United States Trade Representative under Presidential Proclamation 6763 (60 FR 1007).

On April 19, 2012, the Secretary of Agriculture announced an additional in-quota quantity of the TRQ for raw cane sugar for the remainder of FY 2012 (ending September 30, 2012) in the amount of 381,018 metric tons, raw value (MTRV). This quantity is in addition to the minimum amount to which the United States has already committed to pursuant to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Uruguay Round Agreements (1,117,195 MTRV, as announced byFederal Registernotice on August 12, 2011). Finally, USTR has determined to reallocate 73,446 MTRV of the minimum amount of the original TRQ for raw cane sugar from countries that have stated they will be unable to fill previously allocated FY 2012 raw sugar TRQ quantities. USTR is allocating this total quantity of 454,463 MTRV to the following countries in the amounts specified below:

CountryCombined FY 2012 re-allocation and increase
Argentina24,061
Australia46,443
Barbados3,917
Belize6,155
Bolivia4,476
Brazil81,136
Colombia13,430
Costa Rica8,393
Dominican Republic30,000
Ecuador6,155
El Salvador14,548
Guatemala26,858
Guyana6,714
Honduras5,596
India4,476
Mauritius2,000
Mozambique7,275
Nicaragua11,751
Panama16,227
Peru22,942
Philippines75,540
South Africa12,869
Swaziland8,953
Thailand7,834
Zimbabwe6,714

These allocations are based on the countries' historical shipments to the United States. The allocations of the raw cane sugar TRQ to countries that are net importers of sugar are conditioned on receipt of the appropriate verifications of origin, and certificates for quota eligibility must accompany imports from any country for which an allocation has been provided.

Conversion factor: 1 metric ton = 1.10231125 short tons.

Ronald Kirk,
United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2012-10019 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W2-P
 
 
Comment Period Closed
ID: USTR_FRDOC_0001-0199
View original printed format:
PDF

Document Information

Date Posted: Apr 26, 2012
RIN: Not Assigned
Federal Register Number: 2012-10019
Show More Details  

Comments

0
Comments Received*

* This count refers to the total comment/submissions received on this document, as of 11:59 PM yesterday. Note: Agencies review all submissions, however some agencies may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing private or proprietary information, inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-mail campaign. This can result in discrepancies between this count and those displayed when conducting searches on the Public Submission document type. For specific information about an agency’s public submission policy, refer to its website or the Federal Register document.

Document text and images courtesy of the
Federal Register