Small Business Size Standards; Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

This Proposed Rule document was issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder

13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245-AG07

Small Business Size Standards: Professional, Scientific and Technical Services.


U.S. Small Business Administration.


Proposed rule; notice of extension of comment period.


On March 16, 2011, the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or Agency) proposed to increase small business size standards for 35 industries and one sub-industry in North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Sector 54, Professional, Scientific and Technical Services and one industry in NAICS Sector 81, Other Services. SBA provided a 60-day comment period ending on May 16, 2011. In this notice, SBA is extending the comment period an additional 30 days to June 15, 2011.


The comment period for the proposed rule published on March 16, 2011, at 76 FR 14323, is extended through June 15, 2011.


You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3245-AG07 by one of the following methods:

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: Follow the instructions for submitting comments; or

(2) Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Khem R. Sharma, PhD, Chief, Size Standards Division, 409 Third Street, SW., Mail Code 6530, Washington, DC 20416.

For Further Information Contact

The SBA's Office of Size Standards at (202) 205-6618 or .

Supplementary Information

In the proposed rule (76 FR 14323), SBA sought public comment on whether the proposed increases to size standards are appropriate given the economic characteristics of industries. Based on its analysis of industry and Federal procurement data and the use of a common size standard, for some industries SBA proposed to increase the size standards by more than three times their current levels (e.g., Engineering, Architectural and Related Services), while for some other industries proposed increases are more modest (e.g., Computer System Designs and Related Services). SBA also sought public feedback on a number of policy issues regarding its size standards methodology, such as whether SBA's proposal to apply eight fixed size standards levels is appropriate to simplify size standards and whether SBA should adopt a common size standards for related industries although the analysis might support a different size standard for each industry.

As of May 9, 2011, SBA has received over 210 comments to the proposed rule which are posted on . Some comments support SBA's proposed increases, some feel that proposed increases are too large, and others believe that proposed increases are too small. Given the impact the proposed changes might have on affected businesses and the lack of consensus in the comments received to date, SBA believes that the Agency and the affected industries will benefit from more public input before it finalizes any changes. Therefore, SBA is extending the comment period to June 15, 2011. This will also give more time to affected businesses and interested parties to review the proposed changes and prepare accurate, constructive and convincing comments to the proposed rule.

Dated: May 9, 2011.
Joseph Jordan,
Associate Administrator for Government Contracting and Business Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-11707 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
Comment Period Closed
Jun 15 2011, at 11:59 PM ET
ID: SBA-2011-0008-0331
View original printed format:

Document Information

Date Posted: May 13, 2011
RIN: 3245-AG07
CFR: 13 CFR Part 121
Federal Register Number: 2011-11707
Show More Details  


Comments Received*
I strongly agree with increasing the SBA size standard for engineering and surveying firms to $19 million. Firms like mine with 70 employees and $9 million in...
1. To simplify size standards, SBA proposes eight fixed size levels for receipts based size standards: $5.0million, $7.0 million, $10.0 million, $14.0 million...
I am against any change to the $4.5 million limit as being proposed in SBA-2011-0008-0331.

Docket Information

This document is contained in
Related Comments:

* This count refers to the total comment/submissions received on this document, as of 11:59 PM yesterday. Note: Agencies review all submissions, however some agencies may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing private or proprietary information, inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-mail campaign. This can result in discrepancies between this count and those displayed when conducting searches on the Public Submission document type. For specific information about an agency’s public submission policy, refer to its website or the Federal Register document.

Document text and images courtesy of the
Federal Register