Burden of Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Modernization Act Fee Amounts on Small Business

This Notice document was issued by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0529]

Burden of Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Modernization Act Fee Amounts on Small Business; Request for Comments

Agency

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

Action

Notice; Request for comments and information.

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the establishment of a docket to obtain information that will be used to formulate a proposed set of guidelines in consideration of the burden of fee amounts on small business, as set forth in the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). FSMA provides the Agency with authority under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) to assess and collect user fees, including those for costs associated with certain domestic and foreign facility reinspections, failure to comply with a recall order, and importer reinspections. The Agency is seeking public comment on what burdens these fees impose on small business, and whether and how the Agency should alleviate such burdens. In particular, the Agency is seeking public comments on whether a reduction of fees or other consideration for small business is appropriate, and if so, what factors the Agency should consider for each. In addition, the Agency is seeking public comment on how small business should be defined or recognized. FDA is establishing this docket in order to provide an opportunity for interested parties to provide data and share views that will inform future Agency actions with respect to these matters.

Dates

Submit either electronic or written comments by October 17, 2011.

Addresses

Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305). Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

For Further Information Contact

Alexis Nazario-Negron, Office of Financial Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., rm. 210E,Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-7223, Alexis.Nazario-Negron@fda.hhs.gov.

Supplementary Information

I. Background

Each year about 48 million people (1 in 6 Americans) are sickened, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die from food borne diseases, according to recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Refs. 1 and 2). This is a significant public health burden that is largely preventable.

FSMA (Pub. L. 111-353), signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011, enables FDA to better protect public health by helping to ensure the safety and security of the food supply. It enables FDA to focus more on preventing food safety problems rather than reacting to problems after they occur. The law also provides FDA with new enforcement authorities to help it achieve higher rates of compliance with prevention- and risk-based food safety standards and to better respond to problems when they do occur. The law also gives FDA important new tools to better ensure the safety of imported foods and directs FDA to build an integrated national food safety system in partnership with State and local authorities.

Among the new authorities Congress provided in FSMA, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (and by delegation, FDA) is to assess and collect fees from industry for FDA's costs associated with certain activities. Section 107(a) of FSMA (which amends the FD&C Act by adding section 743 (21 U.S.C. 379j-31)) mandates that FDA assess and collect fees for costs associated with certain domestic and foreign facility reinspections, failure to comply with a recall order under sections 423 and 412(f) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 350l and 350a(f)), and certain importer reinspections (section 743(a)(1) of the FD&C Act). (1)

Section 743(b)(2)(A) of the FD&C Act specifies that the Agency must base these fees on an estimation of 100 percent of the costs of the various activities which are described in section 743(a)(1), for the fiscal year. These fees must be published in theFederal Registernot later than 60 days before the start of each fiscal year. Elsewhere in this issue of theFederal Register, FDA is publishing notice of these fees.

Congress directed FDA to publish, within 180 days of enactment of FSMA, a proposed set of guidelines in consideration of the burden of feeamounts on small business (section 743(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the FD&C Act). Such consideration may include reduced fee amounts for small businesses. However, FDA would like to gather additional information before publishing such guidelines. Therefore, the Agency is publishing this notice to request public input to help the Agency understand what factors should be taken into account when drafting the proposed guidelines. The Agency intends to consider the comments received and then publish for comment a proposed set of guidelines on the considerations of the burden of fee amounts on small business.

Any adjustment to the fee schedule for small business must be done through notice and comment rulemaking (section 743(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the FD&C Act). Thus, the Agency would consider the proposed set of guidelines, and comments on such guidelines, in any future rulemaking should it decide to propose to adjust the fee schedule for small business.

II. Request for Comments and Information

In order to better inform the Agency, the Agency seeks comment on the following questions, although any additional comments that can inform the guidelines are welcome.

A. Is a fee reduction or other consideration for small business appropriate? Please explain

Section 743(b)(2)(B)(iii) of the FD&C Act states that the proposed set of guidelines may include consideration of reduced fee amounts for small business, but consideration of reduced fee amounts is not required.

1. What is the impact, if any, of fee amounts on small business, in general, or to specific types of small businesses, that FDA should consider in the proposed set of guidelines? Please explain.

2. Should the Agency consider the type of fee collected when considering the burdens to small business? For example, do the types of activities for which a fee is collected for reinspection have a different impact to a small business than those collected based on a failure to comply with a recall order? Please explain.

3. Assuming there is an impact of fee amounts to small business, or certain types of small businesses, should the Agency consider a reduction in the fees for such small businesses in the proposed set of guidelines? If so, should the Agency consider the reduction in fees to all small businesses, or for only those small businesses that have a demonstrated need for reduced fees? Please explain. If the Agency should not consider a reduction in the fees for small business, why not? Please explain.

4. Are there ways to alleviate any burden on small business other than a fee reduction? Please explain.

B. How should small business be defined or recognized for the purpose of the proposed guidelines?

Several provisions in FSMA require FDA to define small and very small business. For example, section 103(a) of FSMA amends the FD&C Act by adding section 418 (21 U.S.C. 350g) regarding “Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls.” Section 418(n)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act requires FDA to define “small business” and “very small business” for the purpose of the preventive control regulations for facilities. Similarly, FSMA section 105(a) amends the FD&C Act by adding section 419 (21 U.S.C. 350h) regarding standards for produce safety. Section 419(a)(3)(F) of the FD&C Act requires FDA to define “small business” and “very small business” for the purpose of the produce safety regulations.

In addition, the Agency has issued a number of final rules where the Agency considered business size when considering the regulatory impact of the rule to industry, including the following final rules:

  • “Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products” (60 FR 65096, December 18, 1995) (Docket No. FDA-1993-N-0065 (formerly Docket No. 1993N-0195));
  • “Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HAACP); Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Juice” (66 FR 6138, January 19, 2001) (Docket No. FDA-1997-N-0505 (formerly Docket No. 1997N-0511));
  • “Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements” (72 FR 34752, June 25, 2007) (Docket No. FDA-1996-N-0028 (formerly Docket No. 1996N-0417 or 97N-0417));
  • “Food Labeling, Safe Handling Statements, Labeling of Shell Eggs; Refrigeration of Shell Eggs Held for Retail Distribution” (65 FR 76092, December 5, 2000) (Docket No. FDA-1998-N-0087 (formerly Docket No. 1998N-1230); Docket No. FDA-1996-P-0025 (formerly Docket No. 96P-0418); and Docket No. FDA-1997-P-0017 (formerly Docket No. 1997P-0197));
  • “Prevention of Salmonella Enteritidis in Shell Eggs During Production, Storage, and Transportation” (74 FR 33030, July 9, 2009) (Docket No. FDA-2000-N-0190 (formerly Docket No. 2000N-0504)).

FDA seeks comment on how a small business should be defined or recognized for purposes of the proposed set of guidelines in consideration of the burden of fee amounts on small business. More specifically, the Agency requests comment on the following questions.

1. If FDA has defined, by regulation under other FSMA or non-FSMA authorities, an entity as a small or a very small business, should such a definition be considered in the proposed set of guidelines to identify the businesses that may be burdened by the fee amounts under section 743 of the FD&C Act or should the Agency consider a separate definition of small business for purposes of considering the burden of fee amounts? Please explain.

2. If the Agency relies on an existing regulatory definition of small or very small business that the Agency established under other FSMA or non-FSMA authorities, should any such definition apply in any circumstance where a fee is imposed or only where the fee derives from the rule where such business is defined as a small business? For example, if a facility is reinspected for a violation of the preventive controls regulations, should the Agency consider adjustments to the fee only if the facility meets the definition of small business under the preventive controls regulations, or should the Agency consider such adjustments if the facility meets any definition of small business under any FDA regulation? Please explain.

3. There may be circumstances where no regulatory definition of small business exists for a given facility. Under these circumstances, what factors or characteristics should FDA use to identify small businesses for which FDA may consider the burden of fee amounts? Please explain. Factors to consider could include, but are not limited to, the segment of the food supply chain to which the entity belongs (e.g., growers, processors, importers and distributors, retailers, etc.); the sector to which the entity belongs (e.g., seafood, produce, dairy, eggs, juice, dietary supplements, etc.); the number of employees; the gross revenue, net income, net assets, market liquidity, or other financial measures or ratios; and whether the entity has a subsidiary or is a subsidiary of a parent company.

C. If FDA considers reduced fee amounts in the proposed set of guidelines, what factors should FDA consider in establishing the amount by which fees could be reduced?

1. Should FDA consider the following:

  • A waiver of all of the fees;
  • A percentage reduction of the fees; or
  • A fixed dollar reduction of the fees?

2. Are there circumstances that justify one approach over another? Please explain.

3. Are there other approaches that should be considered? Please explain.

III. Comments

Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (seeADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. References

The following references have been placed on display in the Division of Dockets Management (seeADDRESSES) and may be seen by interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. (FDA has verified the Web site addresses, but FDA is not responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web sites after this document publishes in theFederal Register.)

1. Scallan E., R.M. Hoekstra, F.J. Angulo, R.V. Tauxe, M-A. Widdowson, S.L. Roy, et al.,“Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Major Pathogens,”Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1):7-15, 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/1/7.htm.

2. Scallan E., P.M. Griffin, F.J. Angulo, R.V. Tauxe, R.M. Hoekstra, “Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States—Unspecified Agents,”Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1):16-22, 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/1/16.htm.

Dated: July 26, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-19333 Filed 7-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

Footnotes

(1) FDA is not soliciting comments, in thisFederal Registernotice, on the burdens to small businesses that participate in the voluntary qualified importer program (VQIP) under section 743(a)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act. FDA intends to consider such burdens at the time the VQIP is established.

 
 
Comment Period Closed
Oct 17 2011, at 11:59 PM ET
ID: FDA-2011-N-0529-0001
View original printed format:
PDF

Document Information

Date Posted: Aug 1, 2011
Federal Register Number: 2011-19333
Show More Details  

Comments

22
Comments Received*
See attached file(s)
Please refer to the attached official letter of the Secretary of Economy (Mexico's Government) to the specific comments on this topic. Best regards, RGF
FDA-2011-N-0529

Docket Information

This document is contained in
Related Dockets:
None
Related RINs: None
Related Comments:

* This count refers to the total comment/submissions received on this document, as of 11:59 PM yesterday. Note: Agencies review all submissions, however some agencies may choose to redact, or withhold, certain submissions (or portions thereof) such as those containing private or proprietary information, inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-mail campaign. This can result in discrepancies between this count and those displayed when conducting searches on the Public Submission document type. For specific information about an agency’s public submission policy, refer to its website or the Federal Register document.

Document text and images courtesy of the
Federal Register