Final Approval of the Central Indiana 8-hour Ozone Redesignation and Maintenance Plan

This Rule document was issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

For related information, Open Docket Folder  Docket folder icon


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0173;FRL-8484-2]

Determination of Attainment, Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana; Redesignation of Central Indiana To Attainment of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard

Agency

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Action

Final rule.

Summary

On March 26, 2007, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a request for EPA approval of a redesignation of Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties (the Central Indiana Area) to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). IDEM also requested EPA approval of an ozone maintenance plan for this area as a revision of the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). The maintenance plan demonstrates maintenance of the ozone NAAQS in this area through 2020 and establishes 2006 and 2020 motor vehicle Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxides (NO X) emission budgets for this area. EPA is making a determination that the Central Indiana Area has attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is approving, as a SIP revision, the State's ozone maintenance plan for this area. Indiana has satisfied the criteria for the redesignation of the Central Indiana Area to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and, therefore, EPA is approving Indiana's ozone redesignation request for this area. Further, EPA is approving, for purposes of transportation conformity, the VOC and NO X Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs) for 2006 and 2020 that are contained in the 8-hour ozone maintenance plan. EPA proposed these actions on July 31, 2007, and received only one comment in response supporting the proposed actions.

Dates

This final rule is effective on October 19, 2007.

Addresses

EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID NO. EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0173. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet, and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist, at (312) 886-6057 before visiting the Region 5 office.

For Further Information Contact

Edward Doty, Environmental Scientist, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6057, doty.edward@epa.gov.

Supplementary Information

In the following, whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” are used, we mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Table of Contents

I. What Is the Background for This Rule?

II. What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action?

III. What Are Our Final Actions?

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review.

I. What Is the Background for This Rule?

The background for today's action is discussed in detail in EPA's July 31, 2007, proposed rule (72 FR 41658). In that proposed rule, we noted that, under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 8-hour ozone standard is attained in an area when the three-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.08 parts per million parts of air (ppm) at all ozone monitoring sites in the area. (See 69 FR 23857 (April 30, 2004)).

The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that is violating the 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on three consecutive years of air quality monitoring data. EPA designated the Central Indiana Area as a nonattainment area for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in aFederal Registernotice published on April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23857). At the same time, EPA classified the Central Indiana Area as a subpart 1 8-hour ozone nonattainment area, based on quality assured air quality data for the period of 2001-2003.

Under the CAA, a nonattainment area may be redesignated to attainment if sufficient complete, quality-assured data are available for the Administrator to determine that the area has attained the air quality standard and if the area meets other redesignation requirements in section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. On March 26, 2007, Indiana submitted a request for redesignation of the Central Indiana Area to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The redesignation request included three years of complete, quality-assured data for the period of 2004-2006, indicating attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (we have also reviewed available 2007 ozone data for this area, and, to date, have seen no violations of the 8-hour ozone standard). The redesignation request demonstrated that the Central Indiana Area had met the redesignation criteria contained in the CAA. The redesignation request included an ozone maintenance plan and documentation of 2006 and 2020 VOC and NO X MVEBs for this area. Our July 31, 2007, proposed rule (72 FR 41658) provides a discussion of how the Central Indiana Area and the State of Indiana have met the redesignation requirements for this area.

On December 22, 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA's Phase 1 Implementation Rule for the 8-hour Ozone Standard. (69 FR 23951, April 30, 2004). South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (DC Cir. 2006). For the reasons set forth in the July 31, 2007, proposed rule, EPA does not believe that the Court's rulings alter any requirements relevant to this redesignation action so as to preclude redesignation, and do not prevent EPA from finalizing this redesignation.

II. What Comments Did We Receive on the Proposed Action?

EPA provided a 30-day review and comment period. The comment period closed on August 31, 2007. We received only one comment letter from the City of Indianapolis, which supported our proposed approval of Indiana's ozone redesignation request.

III. What Are Our Final Actions?

EPA is taking several related actions for the Central Indiana Area. First, EPA is making a determination that the Central Indiana Area has attained the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is approving Indiana's ozone maintenance plan SIP revision for the Central Indiana Area. EPA is approving the State's request to change the legal designation of the Central Indiana Area from nonattainment to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Finally, for the Central Indiana Area, EPA is approving 2006 MVEBs of 54.32 tons VOC per day and 106.19 tons NO X per day and 2020 MVEBs of 29.52 tons VOC per day and 35.69 tons NO X per day.

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds that there is good cause for these actions to become effective immediately upon publication. This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the nature of a redesignation to attainment, which relieves the area from certain CAA requirements that would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective date for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days after publication if the rule “grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves a restriction,” and section 553(d)(3), which allows an effective date less than 30 days after publication “as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the rule.” The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in 553(d) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes effect. Rather, today's rule relieves the State of planning requirements for this 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. For these reasons, EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for these actions to become effective on the date of publication of these actions.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review

Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a “significant regulatory action” and, therefore, is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.

Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

Because it is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866 or a “significant energy action,” this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Redesignation of an area to attainment under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act does not impose any new requirements on small entities. Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory requirements on sources. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).

Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments

This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government andIndian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

Executive Order 13132: Federalism

This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Redesignation is an action that merely affects the status of a geographical area, and does not impose any new requirements on sources, or allows a State to avoid adopting or implementing additional requirements, and does not alter the relationship or distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.

Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks

This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a State rule implementing a Federal Standard.

National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical area but does not impose any new requirements on sources. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

Congressional Review Act

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in theFederal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in theFederal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 18, 2007. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review, nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to force its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 81

Air pollution control, Environmental protection, National parks, Wilderness areas.

Dated: October 10, 2007.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
Regulatory Text

Parts 52 and 81, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as follows:

Part 52 Amended

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart P—Indiana

2. Section 52.777 is amended by adding paragraph (jj) to read as follows:

§ 52.777 Control strategy: Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons).

* * * * *

(jj) Approval—On March 26, 2007, Indiana submitted a request to redesignate Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Madison, Marion, Morgan, and Shelby Counties (the Central Indiana Area) (Indianapolis ozone nonattainment area) to attainment of the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard. As part of the redesignation request, the State submitted an ozone maintenance plan as required by section 175A of the Clean Air Act. Part of the section 175A maintenance plan includes a contingency plan. The ozone maintenance plan establishes 2006 motor vehicle emission budgets for the Central Indiana Area of 54.32 tons per day for volatile organic compounds (VOC) and 106.19 tons per day for nitrogen oxides (NO X) and 2020 motor vehicle emission budgets for the Central Indiana Area of 29.52 tons per day for VOC and 35.69 tons per day for NO X.

Part 81 Amended

3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

4. Section 81.315 is amended by revising the entries for Indianapolis, Indiana: in the table entitled “Indiana-Ozone (8-Hour Standard)” to read as follows:

§ 81.315 Indiana.

* * * * *

Indiana—Ozone (8-Hour Standard)
Designated areaDesignation a Date 1 TypeClassificationDate 1 Type
    
*******    
Indianapolis, IN:October 19, 2007   
Boone CountyAttainment  
Hamilton CountyAttainment  
Hancock CountyAttainment  
Hendricks CountyAttainment  
Johnson CountyAttainment  
Madison CountyAttainment  
Marion CountyAttainment  
Morgan CountyAttainment  
Shelby CountyAttainment  
    
*******    

* * * * *

[FR Doc. E7-20569 Filed 10-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
 
 
Comments Not Accepted
ID: EPA-R05-OAR-2007-0173-0005
View original printed format:
PDF

Document Information

Date Posted: Oct 19, 2007
RIN: Not Assigned
CFR: 40 CFR 52,81
Federal Register Number: E7-20569
Show More Details  

Docket Information

This document is contained in
Related Dockets: None
Related RINs: None

Document text and images courtesy of the
Federal Register