National Standards for Traffic Control Devices; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways; Notice and Request for Comment

 
Docket ID: FHWA-2012-0118
Agency: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Parent Agency: Department of Transportation (DOT)
Summary:
Highways and Roads, Transportation

Filter Results By...

Document Type

Clear Filter

Posted

Comments Due

Document SubType

View All

    181 results

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0020

    01/24/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0086

    03/07/2013

    Turn on/off preview This document has attachments

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0036

    01/31/2013

    Turn on/off preview This document has attachments

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0099

    03/12/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0132

    03/13/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0138

    03/13/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0097

    03/08/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0178

    03/15/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0028

    01/28/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0018

    01/24/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0135

    03/13/2013

    Turn on/off preview This document has attachments

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0161

    03/13/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0013

    01/24/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0093

    03/08/2013

    Turn on/off preview This document has attachments

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0068

    02/25/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0116

    03/13/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0011

    01/17/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0051

    02/06/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0025

    01/25/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0119

    03/13/2013

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0180

    03/18/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0016

    01/24/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0024

    01/25/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0046

    02/04/2013

    Turn on/off preview

    Mar 12, 2013 11:59 PM ET

    Public Submission

    FHWA

    FHWA-2012-0118-0008

    01/14/2013

      • I support the NCUTCD position for not separating the MUTCD into two documents.

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/24/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0020
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Joe
      • I concur with Brian's comments.

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/07/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0086
      • Organization:
        city of santee
      • Submitter Name:
        Minjie Mei
      undefined
      • Plastic Safety Systems, Inc. recommends that the MUTCD remain a single document. See attached file(s)

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/31/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0036
      • Organization:
        Plastic Safety Systems, Inc.
      • Submitter Name:
        David Cowan
      undefined
      • See attached file(s) FHWA Docket Separating MUTCD TAL Response.docx

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/12/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0099
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Terry Little
      undefined
      • See attached file(s)

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0132
      • Organization:
        Wyoming Department of Transporttion
      • Submitter Name:
        John Davis
      • Splitting the MUTCD into two separate documents is not a good idea at this time, but is a worthwhile option to consider in the future. We need a study of how the MUTCD is being...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0138
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Brad Brimley
      undefined
      • See attached file(s)

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/08/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0097
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        David Boruff
      • 170 comments. Many by some of the best minds in Traffic Engineers. I saw three opinions expressed. One individual commenter supported the proposed change. About 40% (didn't...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/15/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0178
      • Organization:
        Northwest Engineers - Consultant
      • Submitter Name:
        Bob Wagar
      • Seperating the MUTCD into two differenct manuals will add another layer of difficulty and confusion when performing daily tasks and dutires. A better approach may be to seperate...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/28/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0028
      • Organization:
        LADOTD
      • Submitter Name:
        Patrick Landry
      • I view this exercise as absurd. The FHWA commissioned the NCUTCD to carry out some long term strategic planning on where the MUTCD should go, and now, even before the strategic...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/24/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0018
      • Organization:
        Signs and Markings Business Advisors
      • Submitter Name:
        David Jones
      undefined
      • The Florida Department of Transportation supports the FHWA's desire to improve the format of the MUTCD, but is concerned with the unknown impacts at this time that may arise by...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0135
      • Organization:
        Florida Department of Transportation
      • Submitter Name:
        Mark Wilson
      undefined
      • The Maine Turnpike Authority would like the MUTCD to continue in its present form (a single document) for the near future so that the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0161
      • Organization:
        Maine Turnpike Authority
      • Submitter Name:
        Peter Merfeld
      • standard signage should be in place so local agency's cannot put their own interpretation of the purpose of the placed sign. aka using a traffic advisory sign like ...trucks and...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/24/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0013
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Donald Schrader
      undefined
      • See attachment

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/08/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0093
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Grant Levi
      undefined
      • See attached file(s)

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        02/25/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0068
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Paul Carlson
      • Until such time that all recommended practices for traffic control devices can be combined into a single document, the splitting of the MUTCD into standards and applications will...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0116
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Mary Bergin, P.E., PTOE
      • I oppose splitting the document into two. It is not so much SCDOT as it is the local Public Works in the Salkehatchie region (Allendale, Bamberg, Barnwell and Hampton counties...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/17/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0011
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Anonymous
      • Please, please, please do NOT separate the new MUTCD. We, the daily users, need it all in one place. I will get a larger binder if necessary. Thank you.

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        02/06/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0051
      • Organization:
        City of Santa Monica
      • Submitter Name:
        Frank Barnes
      • First and foremost, lets not forget the person in the maintenance/sign truck being asked to use the MUTCD in the field as they go about their work. They are the true customer. The...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/25/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0025
      • Organization:
        Delcan Corp.
      • Submitter Name:
        Steven McDonald
      • Although my experience with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is not extensive, I can speak from the perspective of an aspiring civil engineering student who...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/13/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0119
      • Organization:
        University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez
      • Submitter Name:
        John Matos
      undefined
      • See attached file.

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        03/18/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0180
      • Organization:
        Iowa County Engineers Association
      • Submitter Name:
      • I really do not see the benefit of splitting the MUTCD into two separate volumes. If you do wish to continue to do this, it would probably be best to separate the Signs into one...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/24/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0016
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Darren Brandes
      • I would like to convey my comment on the proposal to split the MUTCD into different documents. I do not support this proposal. Splitting the MUTCD into seperate documents would...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/25/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0024
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Christopher Jordan
      • I understand the desire to separate the MUTCD into two separate documents in order to reduce complexity and confusion by clearly defining the "Standard" requirements. However, this...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        02/04/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0046
      • Organization:
      • Submitter Name:
        Anonymous
      • THIS ENTIRE PROJECT IS BUREAUCRATIC MAKE WORK. TAXPAYERS WANT SMALLER CHEAPER GOVT. WE DONT WANT THIS MADE INTO SEVERAL VOLUMES. THE PRESENT DESIGNATIONS ARE JUST FINE AND HELPFUL...

      • Public Submission
      • Posted:

        01/14/2013

      • ID:
        FHWA-2012-0118-0008
      • Organization:
        AMERICAN CITIZENS
      • Submitter Name:
        Jean Public
    Page
    of 8
    Displaying 1 - 25 of 181